With just one day to go before Michigan and Arizona head to the polls on Tuesday, it appears that Mitt Romney is making a comeback in Michigan while maintaining a strong lead in Arizona. In recent days, Michigan had been trending hard for Rick Santorum, however, it appears that his momentum is slowing considerably as new polling out today indicates the race may be tied.

Report from the Tucson Citizen on Michigan polls:

New polls show Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum are deadlocked in Michigan, on the eve of a pair of key primaries that will boost their claims to the GOP presidential nomination.

Romney has a slight lead in surveys released Sunday by Public Policy Polling and We Ask America in his native state of Michigan, while Santorum is ahead in the poll by Mitchell Research/Rosetta Stone.

The former Massachusetts governor is on more solid ground in new polls out of Arizona, which also holds its primary tomorrow. Michigan, with 30 delegates at stake, is the larger prize and a key swing state that will also factor in the general election.

Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich trail the two leaders in both states, according to the latest polls.

Romney leads Santorum, 39% to 37%, among likely GOP primary voters in the PPP survey in Michigan. He’s ahead by about 4 percentage points in the We Ask America survey.

The Mitchell poll, meanwhile, has Santorum leading Romney, 37% to 35%, among likely GOP voters.

Meanwhile, in Arizona, things are looking good for Romney:

Mitt Romney is headed for an overwhelming victory in Arizona’s primary on Tuesday. He’s at 43% to 26% for Rick Santorum, 18% for Newt Gingrich, and 11% for Ron Paul.

You can make a fair argument that Romney’s already won the Arizona primary. Almost half of those planning to vote have already cast their ballots, and Romney has a 48-25 advantage over Santorum with those folks. That lead makes it nearly impossible for Santorum to make up the difference on election day, and Romney has a 39-27 advantage with those planning to vote on Tuesday anyway.

Michigan could certainly come down to the wire on Tuesday night between Romney and Santorum. The one certainty seems to be coming from Newt Gingrich who predicts he will personally lose both Arizona and Michigan. We could be seeing Ron Paul pick up 3rd place in either contest.


  1. I am becoming disillusioned. First there was the dishonest commercial against Santorum, then he came to Michigan, just to slam Santorum. Then there was the debate, in which he slammed Santorum and Newt, but left Romney alone.

    I think Romney has offered Paul a promise of Treasury Secretary or something. We got a real Bromance going on there.

    I’d like to see Ron Paul as president. Newt is a loose cannon, but he has ideas that Congress could keep sane. Santorum is running for Pope. But they’re all preferable to Sleazebag Romney.

    If Ron Paul is leaving Romney alone specifically for political purposes (getting rid of Santorum), is he really better than any of the others?

    • FOX aired this show: “Illegal Everything” — well worth watching!

      Shows how Americans are “breaking” the law daily, without knowing it, because of the hundreds of millions of rules and regulations. And how cops are using this as an excuse to arrest anybody for just about anything!


    • Since NH, Ron Paul has been trying to get Santorum and Gingrich to drop out so it can be him VS Romney. Gingrich and Santorum had NO support at the time, and couldn’t even get themselves on all the ballots. Santorum is sleazing his way onto them now with his 100% media-driven “Santorum Surge”. Ron needs these 2 hacks (Santorum & Gingrich) out of the race so his contrast to Romney can be made ever more clear to the American people, and so the media has to stop marginalizing him, since there is no way they can spin that Romney is in a race against himself.

      Just look at the AP report on one of Ron Paul’s events in Michigan. They said “40 people lined up to see Ron Paul” about an event where over 2000 people rallied to support him. At MSU, he had a crowd of 4000 people, which would be all over the news it if were for Santorum or Romney… But I doubt it is. I don’t watch TV so I don’t know. But I know they blacked out the 500 troop march on the white house which took place on President’s day so people wouldn’t know how much the troops support Paul.

      You guys need to stop getting drawn into the battle of social issues and the utter facade of a presidential race that the television networks are painting. Ron Paul is the only candidate that is going to cut government spending, end foreign entanglements, and get us back on track.

      Don’t waste your vote!

      RON PAUL 2012!

  2. Ron Paul does not have a backdoor deals with Romney, he is systematically picking rack canidate off one by one. It would not be a good use of resources to run ads against everyone simultaneously. Just wait until Newt then Santorum drop out due to lack of funds and the good Dr. Paul will turn his guns to Romney.

  3. @Surfisher

    Excellent video..thank you from Canada. Had no idea things have gotten that bad for American Citizens. It explains the 600+ FEMA concentration camps ready. They have to know that Americans won’t take much more of this. They are expecting martial law in the USA.
    I’m already passing this video around for others who may still be sleeping.

    • It is estimated that nearly 500,000,000 as of 2010 (and each year EVEN MORE are passed) — about 1/2 billion — NEGATIVE Laws/rules/regulations are on the books, meaning: “You, the US Citizen, cannot do 1/2 billion things, because we, the Government, have deemed such actions ILLEGAL.”

      More Negative Laws than the total count of US Citizens (including babies, children, and adults in our Nation)!

      The Arrogance of Office is best displayed by this pernicious Sophism: “Ignorance of the Law is no excuse”.

      No sane person can expect an individual to memorize all the names of the 312 million US Citizens — but same individual is expected to know the EXACTITUDE of ALL 1/2 billion LAWS (or be penalized for the IGNORANCE)?!

      The Great Roman Statesman Cicero stated: ‘The MORE Laws in a Nation, the LESS Justice for the Citizens’ — nearly 2000 years later, Cicero’s warning rings true: *More Laws = Less Liberty*)!

      I’ve been saying it for decades, with no avail — now FOX comes to the rescue (hope you can disseminate it through “tweeter”, “facebook” and other internet means you young people are aware)!
      Thank you.


  4. I can’t see how Michigan can vote for Santorum. He is still campaigning on the issue of Wall Street bailout vs auto bailout. It was explained to him by Romney, and all the other candidates agreed. He still doesn’t understand it. If he can’t understand that, how can he understand the economy He also said he had backed Specter for represenative because they had made a deal. Specter has come out and said that is not so. Aren’t people listening? That is why Ron Paul gets on his case.

  5. Can someone tell me why Dr. Paul is being ignored by mainstream media? In my opinion, the government fears him. He wants the law to align with the constitution, which will greatly reduce the government’s power over us. Why can’t you people see that? unless you want the government running every aspect of your life, (a police state), vote Ron Paul. He’s he only one we can trust right now.

    • It is the truth, he is the only one, who can be trusted. But NO commitement between Ron paul and other these republican 3-disasters. Ron Paul and new, good, normal government

    • Because he’s not giving them “news.”

      You need to LOOK like a candidate, and you have to give them raw meat. The only good thing about his ad against Santorum is that it shows that he CAN boil things down to bite-size. He needs to do that in the debates.

      He DID get media attention when he said he called Santorum a fake because he IS a fake. That got plenty of air-play. If he had done one-liners like that from the outset, he would have gotten the same attention that Herman Cain got.

      You simply don’t get on the tube by giving lectures.

  6. Do we want Obamacare to be replaced by Romneycare? NO
    Do we want a candidate who changes opinion every week? NO
    We need someone who can take back the White House! Someone who has grassroot support, can beat Obama. The national polls show Santorum has a good change of beating Obama. Unite! Santorum 2012!!!

    • John

      Is Romneycare going to replace Obamacare? I didn’t know that. doh!

      Which candidate is changing their opinion every week? doh!

      Was the White House taken? Who took it? And where was it taken? There are plenty of thieves in the House and in the Senate – maybe they took it.

      I gotta tell ya, ONE Grassroot doesn’t seem like much support at all, especially going against Obama.

      Compared to Obama’s BILLION DOLLAR Campaign, “Good Change”, isn’t really gonna do it. Maybe a national poll on Good Change vs. Bad Change vs. NO Change – Santorum might win. But voting for Santorum will be NO Change from Obama, that’s for sure.

      Unite? Yes. Behind Santorum? No. Only Ron Paul can make the word “Unite” actually mean something to the People. (Good try, though)

  7. Santorum? Are you kidding me? He’s sooooo pro war. His check from the bankers would fit nicely in his back pocket. And Romneys would deposit well in his foreign bank account. Are you blind? All three other than Paul want to continue War… for what?
    You’ll always have to be afraid of terrorists. Man, you’re already presumed as terrorist if you go against (speak) your government. Santorum won’t do squat for the people.

  8. for those that are confused a bit of of history on Ron Paul style isolationism.

    Before both WWI and then WWII, we tried this. Back then the Republicans were actually more progressive than now. We pretty much won WWI just by getting in however we would have saved a lot of lives had we not had the isolationist allowed it.

    WWII on the other hand was nearly lost because nobody learned the lesson about the folly of isolation and would have been lost if it wasn’t for 2 things.

    1. The Japanese bombed us which changed everything changed

    2. Albert Einstein defected and talked the other Jewish scientist into doing the same. This let us to get the bomb ahead of the enemy.

    If not for these 2 reason we would have lost.

    When you are dealing with people kill there own people, threaten to or do attack people either based on hate or being different based on hate or fear then they need.

    Hitler killed 6 million, Stalin 60 million and Chairman Mao 123 Million. Even though late we stopped Hitler, we went right back into the isolationist stand with Stalin even though General Patin offered to stop him. There would have been no Chairman Mao had we stopped Stalin.

    • and you see that the main reason of all these wars is what just like in case of USA, it is globalism, it is cranky, disgusting will to conqzúer, to rule over everything. It has not worked in the past, it will not work now and globalism will lead USA to complete fall and disaster and US nation to tragedy.
      That´s why vote for Ron Paul and have normal, sane president.

    • I would disagree with you on a number of accounts. If it were not for the Lusitania, we could have, and should have stayed out of WWI. There was no purpose for that war, except that countries had alliances, and when the Arch Duke bit the big one, Europe fell into war like a house of cards. Just meaningless mass murder.

      And the desperation of Germany and the rise of Hitler were a direct consequence of the unnecessarily harsh terms of WWI.

      Whenever nations “punish” one another, you have calamity.

    • Tim

      Boy. Did you buy into the CRAP that is taught in high school. Revisionist History seems to be the name-of-the-game.

      Perhaps a little education video in History is appropriate, rather than saying “you don’t really know the REAL History behind your History”. And as Paul Harvey used to say “Now you know the Rest of the Story”

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ (5 parts)

  9. Prime Minister Churchill begged our president to enter WWI several years earlier. American isolationist wouldn’t have it. That isn’t revisionism. Trying to ignore that we almost lost the war is.

    • Tim

      Wrong again. Churchill didn’t beg for the United States to enter WW2. He begged for weapons, destroyers and supplies. Thus the Atlantic Charter was Drafted and Signed by Roosevelt and Churchill. This Document put Great Briton “in-it’s-place” regarding it’s “interventionist” colonization, colonialism and imperialism of Asia and Africa. (See where this “Interventionist Foreign Policy” eventually leads? TROUBLE!)

      The United States didn’t officially enter the war until after Pearl Harbor. The United States, though not officially in the Atlantic Theater, was supplying weapons, destroyers and supplies to Great Briton. The US also cut-off oil supplies to Japan and froze their assets. Japan took this as an “Act of War” and decided to take the resources “by force”. Thus, they bombed Pearl Harbor. (Is Sanctions against Iran, an “Act of War”?) Hmmm.

      But by the end of September 1940 (before Pearl Harbor), the “Tripartite Pact” united Japan, Italy and Germany to formalize the Axis Powers. The Tripartite Pact stipulated that any country, with the exception of the Soviet Union, not in the war which attacked any Axis Power would be forced to go to war against all three.

      So, AFTER Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, the United States declared war on Japan. This lead the other members of “Tripartite Pact” to declare war on the United States. Thus, we entered the European Theater. But, as it turned out, it was Stalin (Soviets) who “begged” the United States to open a Western Front because the Soviets were getting annihilated on the Eastern Front. They suffered almost 25 MILLION Casualties during the war.

      In a nutshell, neutrality was what the American People WANTED prior to WW2. It wasn’t people, like Ron Paul, who “prevented” the United States from entering the war. That’s just another LOAD OF CRAP “propagated” by the Warmongering Neo-Cons. Ron Paul says we should OBEY the Constitution and have the Congress “Declare War”, as we did in WW2.

      However, since WW2, the Warmongering Neo-Cons have “hijacked” Our Foreign Policy and have “usurped” Our Constitution to where we are becoming NO better than Japan and Germany during WW2. THAT’S NOT WHAT A FREEDOM LOVING, LAW ABIDING DEMOCRACY IS ALL ABOUT!

      It’s TIME to END this Mission of “Empire America” that these EVIL Warmongering Neo-Cons have instilled into our American Culture and into our Churches. Do we want “continuous” Wars that are driving us into Bankruptcy? Or do we want Peace, which leads to Prosperity? SCREW THESE NEO-CONS!

      • Roosevelt had many one on one discussions with Churchill as to how they could get around the isolationist in America. Roosevelt actually wanted to go in. He didn’t because the isolationist didn’t see the threat.

        In short there were two many people who thought as you do.

        It has taken many years for non-liberals to bring up why we should ignore what goes on in the world. You can’t allow dictators to kill.

        I do agree that we should declare a war.

        I do like all other stands Paul takes. But I will never support isolationist. It’s just what the worlds bully’s want.

        • Tim

          In the 1940 Presidential Election Campaign, Roosevelt promised to keep America out of the war. He stated, “I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again; your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.” Nevertheless, FDR wanted to support Britain and believed the United States should serve as a “great arsenal of democracy.” Churchill pleaded “Give us the tools and we’ll finish the job.” In January 1941, following up on his campaign pledge and the prime minister’s appeal for arms, Roosevelt proposed to Congress a new military aid bill.


          I see you are deliberately propagating the terms Non-Interventionism and Isolationism. (A typical tactic used by Warmongering Neo-Cons as a “FEAR” Mechanism) Ron Paul supports Non-Interventionism as our Founders have recommended will follow, NOT Isolationism.



          Tim – So because bad things happen to people all around the world, you’re essentially “advocating” that the United States should be The Policemen of the World. We’re already “bombing” 6 Countries and now the Neo-Cons have Syria and Iran in their cross-hairs. They didn’t attack us, but I suppose it’s ok with you to “pervert” the meaning of National Security and National Defense with Wars of Aggression and Preemptive War.

          • Yes as the only super power left we should stick up for Iran and Syria.

            Let me ask a question and please think to yourself before you answer because I do respect that you believe for moral reasons against ware. Ask yourself “what if I was living in Homs, Syria and my child was just killed by a bomb dropped by my own Government”. Wouldn’t you want someone to intervene.

            For moral reasons I can’t think “oh that is non of my business.

            • My opinion is that governments derive their legitimacy from the people. Conversely, it is the responsibility of the people to overthrow their own government.

              Tunisia and Egypt were perfect examples. The Soviet Union fell because the army refused to attack its own peaceful citizens. Non-violent protest and civil disobedience is the right way to bring about change.

              I do not feel comfortable with Western powers attacking Libya. I do not feel comfortable with our covert support of what is now a civil war in Syria.

              It is the people’s responsibility to demand and fight for their own democracy. It is not something that should be imposed by foreigners, no matter how well intentioned. When the time is right, tyrants will fall of their own weight.

          • Tim

            By the same token, Tim, I want you to ask yourself a similar question. “What if I was living in Homs, Syria and my child was just killed by a bomb dropped by a far away Foreign Government that my Country didn’t do anything to. Wouldn’t you want someone to exact revenge? Now, Imagine this same scenario playing out in Texas…

            Tim – Please watch these videos


            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIYtkemI0bk (viewer discretion)

            When will it be enough?

      • Two additional things. Neutrality is the same thing as Isolationist. The people were in that frame of mind at that time. Which is why we had to stay out. That ended at Pearl Harbor.

        I wouldn’t have been for having Russia as an ally. We could have achieved the same results by just agreeing to not be enemies. Hitler killed 6 million people. Stalin killed 60.

        If someone doesn’t stop genocide it will stop only after everyone is dead. Russia could have been stopped right after WWII but people had already started back at the isolationist line. Truman had made it clear that he couldn’t stop Russia because the “people wanted peace”.

        So tens of millions died instead. Paul has only brought up that the never attacked us. Why would they? They had what they wanted already.

  10. to Der

    It is not globalism if we are protecting people that are dying by the millions or that are under dictators.

    Saying we are globalist is being American apologist.

  11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=CFfVeXhtRa0

    All this is true a farmer near us got raided for raw milk then they came up with the herd share clause. Felt bad for them messing up their house raiding and treating them like criminals. A family on a budget who just wishes to weep the benefits of raw milk knows a herd share is too expensive. Too many damn laws against us and not enough benefits.

    I’ll stick with Ron Paul in 2012 thank-you

  12. Ron Paul is about half right whenever he speaks. There are times when we must take action to prevent atrocities and to deal with dangers before they are on our shores rather than after. Like it or not, unreasonable people aren’t always going to listen to reason, and force may be the only thing they will listen to. On the other hand, decisions to go to war need to be carefully weighed. It’s simply not possible for us to impose our will on the rest of the world by force or to solve every other nations’ problems. We have to carefully consider our defensive requirements and the best ways to use our limited resources to accomplish those objectives.

  13. Newt’s ideas arent crazy! ther able achievable adn legitimate! He really is an all around great presidetail matrial but eopl just cant get past the word like “crazy” ideas! Of course when the economy is stable again then some of them could be carried through, thats just common sence. I find it funny how RON PAUL is a libritarian which means going stricktly by the constitution supposdly being the most conservative is the most LEFT in his views on war like saying that people who would love to kill us that its okay for them to have a nuclear bomb because everyon else does! escuse me what about september 11? All I know is that like Finny from A Seperate Peace Paul cant really see the wrong in this PARTICULAR SUBJECT regaurding war. I would feel very unsaf if he was our president.Anyways if your with me on this and if your going to vote for a REAL conservative Newt comment I love

  14. Ron Paul WILL become President in 2012 — IF, Romney becomes a Patriot, and forgoes his ego, for the Good of the People!

    Mitt Romney could become one of the greatest Statesmen in US History! He’d be the Savior of our Nation — the one that generations to come would tell their children: “Look at this statue, this is Mitt Romney, he saved America”!

    Or, he can reduce himself to just a tiny footnote…what is amazing is that his fate rests in his own hands (a very rare occurrence throughout the history of the world)!

    All Romney has to do, is to take advantage of this rarest of historical moments, and make a SINGLE DECISION!!!

    Withdraw his candidacy IN FAVOR of Ron Paul, with the following grandiose and heart-wrenching patriotic speech (to save his political skin):

    “I, Mitt Romney, will sacrifice my political goals for the Good of the People. Now I understand that only Ron Paul can save our Nation. I agree with all he stands for, therefore, I have deemed that our Nation’s salvation can only be accomplished when Ron Paul is elected as President of the United States of America. Without regret, but with joy, I do the most honorable and patriotic deed I can — I withdraw myself from this election, and give my full support to Ron Paul!”

    One honest person is needed to bring these logical conclusions to Romney’s PERSONAL ATTENTION (not the myopic sycophants surrounding him and stroking his ego by chanting wishful thinking as ‘fact’: “You gonna win Boss, you gonna win Boss….).

    Regardless how egotistical, arrogant and narcissistic Romney may be, some semblance of reasoning of what’s best for him, should still remain in his skull. The instinct for self preservation dictates that even the smallest of minds will chose the path that leads to safety, not the one leading to disaster.

    An honest realist needs to talk to Romney one-on-one — and explain the following to him, so Mitt can comprehend it:

    1) If you don’t win the nomination, than your political career is over (you’ll become just a tiny footnote in US History as a failure).

    2) If you win the nomination, and don’t defeat Obama — which is the most probable outcome (you’ll become just a tiny footnote in US History as an even LARGER failure).

    Therefore, Dear Mitt, whichever gamble you take from the above, may lead to total disaster for your political career (and probably will)!

    However, here is an action you can take, Dear Mitt, that guarantees you’ll become immortalized in the annals of US History — becoming the 21st Century Savior of America (surely this carrot of success will entice Romney’s egotism to go for it — over the probable political beatings he’d receive otherwise)!

    All one needs to do, to assure Mitt’s Historical Greatness of Sacrifice for the Good of the Nation, is to present the above to Romney’s eyes alone! I urge all able to do so, to place this document in front of him!

    Send this to Mitt Romney — as an Open Letter, e-mails, etc. — the more you send, the greater the chance he’ll get to read it!

  15. If you dare to believe that any of these wars in the Middle East was for ‘humanitarian purposes’ then you deserve whatever fate lies ahead. Shame on the USA and ever person that allows these people to take over your country and do what they’ve done to innocent civilians. I’m not American. I can’t imagine if my country ever had anything to do with this. This is disgusting and unspeakable and yet I hear jokes in comments about foreign people.
    When you see films of what depleted uranium (used in US shells) does to a land and it’s people, it would make you sick. And still, they plan to continue wiping out the East side of the World.
    They’ve planned all this for so long that you slept and wouldn’t believe it. Now it’s all happening and you can do nothing to stop it. Shame on the West. The nothing human about taking away an unknown persons life-line for greed and killing his land forever. Just sickening.

    • We were attacked without warning on 9/11. Shame on the Talaban & al Quada. Any country that supported them is lucky to still exist. Any Country but the US would have wiped any country supporting them off the face of the earth. I would be quiet because several people running for office are getting real tired of this kind of talk from still in the 1800’s.

      No one would have done this when Reagan was in office because he would have bombed the leader of that country’s house. Study the response to Libia’s attack.

      Iran is building nukes, the US is reducing them. Iran has a Phyco in charge the is threatening not just Isreal but other Arab countries as well.

      • Tim

        Yeah. I always wondered why the United States didn’t bomb Saudi Arabia off the face of the Planet after 9/11. After all, 3/4 of the Terrorists from 9/11 all came from Saudi Arabia.

        It must be that “blind eye” that the Neo-Cons possess which has them conquering all the surrounding nations, first. I’m sure we’ll get around to them sooner or later.

        • I said any other country, say Russia for instance would have. Also Saudi Arabia didn’t support the Talaban or al Quada. In fact the expelled the people you refer too.

          Let’s not put words in my mouth.

  16. to Darrel

    If a leader of a country kills thousands of there own people or those of there neighbors that is an attack on us.

    I do believe that we should (like Reagan did) attach the government and preferably the dictator and not the people or even the military of the country. I don’t believe we should invade and then occupy the country.

    Reagan decided to remove our military after the marine barracks bombing. He then investigated who was responsible and bombed his house. We had no problem from that point on with Lybia until recently with the revolution.

    to Goethe Behr

    60 million people died in Russia before they got a better life. Before they developed nukes we could have stopped that. Instead we fought on the same side in WWII.

    Even though we were lied to in Vietnam as to why we were fighting, had we fought for the right reasons we may have saved a lot of the 123 Million people killed by China. Even Vietnam after winning changed allies and moved in line with Russia out of fear of China.

    • Tim

      It’s a shame that John Rambo didn’t sign on for the task. Oh well. He didn’t, so let’s bring in the Military and bomb the people and occupy their lands anyway. Wasn’t this exactly what Japan and Germany did during WW2? I’m sure they had the same excuses and lines of reasoning as the Neo-Cons do. Conquer the World and Build an Empire!

      • Again putting words in my mouth. I said I was for bombing the dictators only. No bombing of others and no occupation. While we are at it no nation building.

        In WWII we would have found it very difficult to bomb Hilter. We now can.

        Right now however, we bomb when our interest are threatened only. We let 5 yr olds die in Africa by people who just to prove they are in charge or because of hate, but will attack Iraq for the wrong reasons. Had we attacked only Sodoma’s House only for killing his own people we would have been on the right side.

        Yes if we are going to protect those who are unable to defend themselves like 5 yr olds that were killed, then we should be the Policemen of the word. I would not want to live in a world were there is no world power to stop them.

        If this is against our constitution. We need to change our constitution. Keep in mind that we were not a super power at the time it was written.

  17. NEWT GINGRICH FOR PRESIDENT ! WHOS WITH ME??? COMMENT IF YOU LIKE I FEEL VERY UNHEARD ROGHT NOW WITH YOU GUYS AND YOUR ARGUMNTS THATS WHY MY LETTERS ARE IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS! anyways he’s a REAL genius and conservative and bwt RON PAUL Is a PASIFIST! if you dont know what this word mans look it up and being this way is good when war or DEFENDING is NOT nessisary, but being a PACIFIST when war IS nessisary when people in which we fight are learning in their religion to kill us is a con! Ron Paul is the farthest LEFT in his views of war and it cold be very dangerouse to have him as our president.

    • Anyway, I have respect for Newt, but he won’t be the candidate. The “Party” chooses the candidate. The primaries are for show.

      But Ron Paul is not a “pacifist.” And he’s not an “isolationist.” He just doesn’t see the need for the paranoia and xenophobia of people who think we should have troops all over, and now, for the last eight years, we’re starting wars of aggression. That is just not “The American Way.”

      But it’s nice to hear from you. Ninety percent of the comment writers are for Ron Paul. Probably five percent are for Santorum, four percent for Gingrich, and about one percent for Romney.

  18. Sahara

    Spoken like a true Warmongering “We can do whatever we want around the World” Neo-Con.

    It don’t matter to Neo-Cons how many innocent people are slaughtered through mass murder, just as long as it’s only “they” who do the killing. Neo-Cons believe they have the “Moral Authority” to decide WHO lives and WHO dies in this world. They think they are somehow “allowed” to INVADE Sovereign Foreign Countries under the auspices of “protecting the people from their dictator” or “helping to spread Democracy”, but the WORLD KNOWS it’s all a “Sham”. It’s all about Oil and Natural Resources. They could “Care-Less” if the World HATES the United States – they’re going to do it anyway.

    These Neo-Cons just LOVE IT when people can sit behind their computer screens stationed in Virginia and watch from the camera mounted on the predator drone as it “swoops” down on their “Target”. They CLAP THEIR HANDS like “trained seals” as the “button in pushed”, like in some video game, launching those missiles which “annihilate” their “Target” (along with 50 or so innocent Civilians). Opps! I guess they shouldn’t have been there. They were in the Wrong place – At the Wrong Time. Oh Well. Collateral Damage always happens with these damn drones. Could you please pass the salt?

    Neo-Cons like to declare Ron Paul a Pacifist, even though he’s made many statements saying he’s not. But at least he SERVED HIS COUNTRY in the Military, unlike “Chicken-Hawk” Gingrich who went after Deferments to get out of Serving. He had all those “skirts” to chase after.

  19. All that I can say is that America did’t start any war.
    First of all we are protecting ourselves from radicals who would lke to exterminate America and others, and TEACH it.
    EXAMPLE: September the 11th
    Secondly you made the point HATES the USA and that is why they seek to attack us and if we dont DEFEND ourselves more and more acts of TERRORISM will occur.

    Third I do belive that INNOCENT lives should not be taken yet I strongly belive that People like terrorists who try to take innocent lives along with thier own lives should be delt with in term of war.

    Fourth I do belive that Ron Paul is the Most conservative all aspects and goes directly by the constitution exept for his views on war.

    Fith the wat you described Neo-Cons clapping thier hands “as the button is pushed” is the same way an accomplished boming against the US is treated the only difference is that radical -(notice I say radical muslims because they differ from muslims) that hey believe that they will be rewarded in heaven for killing americans brothers ans mothers as they did in 9/ 11 and they see ABSOLUTLY no wrong in doing so. This is why we STILL need to be in war and its no fault its our DUTY to make sure our people are safe in America.

    Finally Newt Gingrich dos have an abnormal and some may call it an immoral record with his marriges but that has nothing to do with the way he’d run this country.I am still hoping that Newt could pull ahead in this allection !THOSE WHO WOULD LIKE RON PAUL TO Win, I personally believe that he isnt doing so well in th polls but I have a hope that after this upcoming presidency Senator Rand Paul (Ron’s son) will run for president he supported the war in Afghanistan an opposed the rapid withdrawal of troops. He supports trying terrorists caught on the battlefield in militia tribunals at the detention camp of Guantanama Bay.

    • Sahara

      You better get used to something that may seem to you to be totally Un-American. It is. The reason is because it is SO EVIL that it’s beyond the scope of Human Decency. There’s a lot more to our “Foreign Policy” than just killing “Radicals” or “Terrorists”. There have been “Powers Behind the Throne” (so to speak) that have dictated Foreign Policy for Financial Gain for many years. Now, it has morphed into just “Power and Control”. And you know what? They’re USING YOU!


  20. Mitt Romney = Judas Goat

    If not aware of this olden days’ meaning — here it is:

    When sheep are led to be slaughtered, they instinctively feel something is wrong. So, mill around and bleat, but won’t enter the gate leading to the one waiting to smash their heads with a sledge hammer. So, a Judas goat is placed in the pen. The Judas goat is trained to associate with sheep or cattle, leading them through the gate, and passing it safely — while its own life is spared, the ones flowing get their brains bashed!

    Mitt will lead us — and at the end of the gate, Bama will wield the sledge hammer….

Comments are closed.