Who is Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters, JRB Ware, Celtic, and “The Big Guy”?
House investigators would certainly like to find out. The most likely culprit is President Joe Biden, a man who time and time again claimed he had no involvement in his son Hunter’s foreign business dealings.
New records, however, indicate that Joe Biden may have often used pseudonyms and alias accounts when emailing in and out of the White House during his time as Barack Obama’s Vice president. On many of these emails, Hunter Biden is copied and the information contains correspondence related to foreign business transactions.
As The Hill reports, the issue is just now coming to light as a potential bombshell lead in untangling and unraveling the corrupt Biden family business enterprise:
Various committees and private groups are seeking more than 5,000 emails from Biden in which he used an array of aliases during the Obama administration.
Under the Presidential Records Act, Obama has 30 days to bar the release of the emails and to help shield his former vice president in a growing corruption scandal over the influence-peddling operation run by Biden’s son, Hunter.
Recently, it was learned that Joe Biden went by a variety of code names and false names, including Robin Ware. Robert L. Peters, JRB Ware, Celtic and “The Big Guy.” House investigators believe that may only be a partial list. For many Americans, it is understandably unnerving to learn that their president has more aliases than Anthony Weiner. However, while the number seems unusual, the practice is not unprecedented.
So what? The Vice President, similar to many government officials, used a code name or fake name in some official correspondence. The practice isn’t entirely new despite being unethical and possibly illegal depending on the circumstances.
The issue with Joe Biden’s use of fake email names concerns the content of the emails and what exactly is being hidden, as the story continues:
The problem is that there was “work” being discussed on some of these emails, including official foreign travel plans and the hiring of associates of Hunter for high-level positions. More importantly, some emails are relevant to the clients of Biden’s son. Biden has previously lied that he knew nothing of these dealings, but these emails could reveal even more about his knowledge and involvement.
Congress is investigating more than $20 million that was transferred to members of the Biden family from foreign sources through a labyrinth of shell companies and accounts. Even the Washington Post has been forced to admit that the president has lied in the past about aspects of Hunter’s dealings. Devon Archer recently confirmed that Joe Biden’s long-standing denial of any knowledge of their business dealings is “categorically false.”
At issue is whether Joe Biden was lending his influence toward his family’s ability to siphon foreign money by offering access to the second-highest official in the land during the Obama administration.
There are also clear-cut actions that resulted from Joe Biden’s involvement in foreign business matters, such as the time he ensured a Ukrainian prosecutor was fired while trying to investigate the energy company that gave Hunter Biden a board seat and millions in compensation:
Obviously, these foreign clients believed that they were buying more than an illusion for the millions they spent. One corrupt Ukrainian figure said that Hunter Biden was dumber than his dog, but that he paid him anyway for access to his father.
There are indications that these clients did receive more than illusion. For example, Archer described how Burisma executives were worried about the anti-corruption investigation being conducted by Ukrainian prosecutor general Viktor Shokin. Archer testified that Hunter immediately “called D.C.” in response to the plea. Shokin was later fired at Joe Biden’s demand.
The extent and full context of Biden’s fake email names are not yet known. There are likely a lot of meaningless emails but there are quite likely material communications related to Hunter Biden’s business dealings, something Joe Biden should be forced to answer for.
From what is known so far, there’s an awful lot of smoke in this story that seems like it’s about to catch fire:
In one email from Hunter’s laptop, Biden associate James Gilliar explained the rules to Tony Bobulinski, then a business partner of Hunter. He was not to speak of the former veep’s connection to any transactions. “Don’t mention Joe being involved,” he wrote, “it’s only when u [sic] are face to face, I know u [sic] know that but they are paranoid.” Instead, they referred to the Big Guy or Celtic.
Likewise, a trusted FBI source said that a Ukrainian businessman had said that he paid a bribe to Joe Biden, but noted that they were told to avoid using his name and to transfer the money through a complex series of accounts.
Moreover, the request of Congress followed the discovery that staffers had used Biden’s fake government account, Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov, to send a message about meeting then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko with a cc to Hunter Biden.
These aren’t easily explained messages and they don’t outright convict Joe Biden of wrongdoing. They do, however, fly contradictory to claims that the former Vice President, at the time, had no involvement with his family’s foreign business transactions.
A fight is currently underway by Congress to retrieve more of the records from the National Archives and Records Administration, known as NARA. The agency is putting up a wall in front of what should be records that legally must be released to Congressional investigators.
Of course, Joe Biden is working to prevent access to his official email records and the various pseudonyms he used while conducting business during the Obama administration.
They say it’s the cover-up, not the crime, that gets you in trouble. The email coverup of Joe Biden’s fake aliases might be his eventual undoing.
