Perhaps the next question is, when will President Biden be forced to answer for the business dealings of his son and his part in the corruption? Last year, during the 2020 presidential campaign, a laptop surfaced at a Delaware computer repair shop alleged to be owned by Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden. The laptop contained mounds of scandalous information, including emails that purportedly showed a setup of payments and money flowing from foreign entities and foreign governments into the Biden family, including the Joe “big guy” Biden at the top.
The media quickly dismissed the laptop, despite many levels of corroboration and authenticity proving at the time at least some of the material could be confirmed as genuine. The entire laptop was dismissed by a complicit media as a “Russian disinformation campaign” and Joe Biden was never forced to answer the questions raised about the documented Biden family corruption and his role in it.
Now, a year later, more and more of the contents of the laptop are being confirmed as authentic, and even some media outlets which preached the disinformation narrative at the time have been forced to retract and/or scrub their old 2020 stories.
In a short mention a couple of days ago, Politico confirmed that it had authenticated more of the email contents of the laptop, allegedly showing a damning connection from President Biden to the foreign money corruption scandal involving his son, Hunter Biden, and his brother, Jim Biden:
A person who had independent access to Hunter Biden’s emails confirmed he did receive a 2015 email from a Ukrainian businessman thanking him for the chance to meet Joe Biden. The same goes for a 2017 email in which a proposed equity breakdown of a venture with Chinese energy executives includes the line, “10 held by H for the big guy?” (This person recalled seeing both emails, but was not in a position to compare the leaked emails word-for-word to the originals.)
MORE: Emails released by a Swedish government agency also match emails in the leaked cache, and two people who corresponded with Hunter Biden confirmed emails from the cache were genuine.
It’s easy to dismiss the contents of the laptop by itself as “Russian disinformation,” but it’s harder to dismiss outside, independent trustworthy sources who were also on the email chains and have original copies of the emails as well.
The fact that it has taken a year for any media outlet to gain minor interest in quite possibly the biggest story of political corruption in decades speaks volumes about the terrible quality of our news media. At the time, back in 2020, Politico wrote that the entire laptop was disinformation (October 19, 2020):
More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Many at the time pointed out that none of these intelligence officers offered anything more than their opinion that the laptop was a part of a Russian disinformation effort, never mind the fact that there were individuals and journalists at the time who already corroborated some of the damning laptop material proving it’s authenticity.
It was the New York Post back in 2020 that originally broke the Hunter Biden laptop story, and the paper was ridiculed highly at the time, even having its social media accounts suspended in a coordinated effort to suppress the information on behalf of the Biden campaign.
On Tuesday of this week, the Post took a victory lap calling out other media outlets as too lazy or too complicit with the Democratic Party to bother checking and reporting anything that would be damaging to Joe Biden during a presidential year:
In his new book, “The Bidens: Inside the First Family’s Fifty-Year Rise to Power,” Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger says that evidence points to Hunter Biden’s laptop being legit.
While we appreciate the support, the truth is The Post’s reports always have been true, and it’s only because the media wants to protect Joe Biden that they keep referring to the laptop as “unsubstantiated.”
Schreckinger notes that “A person who had independent access to Hunter Biden’s emails” confirms two of the emails The Post published, including one about a potential deal with China with the line “10 held by H for the big guy?” — that is, Joe Biden.
But Hunter Biden’s former business partner Tony Bobulinski already said those emails were authentic — the media just ignored him.
The cover-up back in 2020 was an embarrassment of media malpractice. Despite corroboration and proof that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden, and authenticated emails at the time, the media ignored the story to keep President Trump out of the White House for a second term.
Had Joe Biden been forced to answer for his direct and indisputable role in the foreign money flowing into his family’s bank accounts, his campaign would have assuredly collapsed as the “nice guy” image would be tarnished forever as another corrupt politician using his power and influence to become wealthy.
To this day, the media is still ignoring the story. The New York Times recently updated its own story from 2020 but is still trying to quietly sweep the Biden crime family corruption under the rug:
The New York Times has stealthily deleted its false claim that a New York Post report about Hunter Biden’s laptop was “unsubstantiated.”
The outlet quietly removed the word “unsubstantiated” from an online article on Monday in its report revealing the Federal Election Commission’s ruling that Twitter did not violate election laws when it censored The Post’s reporting on the laptop ahead of the 2020 election.
Joe Biden is a compromised president. He owes the American people answer for emails that purportedly label him as “the bug guy” entitled to 10 percent of Hunter Biden’s corrupt foreign business dealings, and then some. What did he know and when did he know it?
When will President Biden answer these questions and when will the media hold him accountable? Perhaps the next question is when will President Biden resign and admit his wrongdoing?
